Appendix D Tips and Conventions

This chapter describes no additional features of Emacs Lisp. Instead it gives advice on making effective use of the features described in the previous chapters, and describes conventions Emacs Lisp programmers should follow.

You can automatically check some of the conventions described below by running the command M-x checkdoc RET when visiting a Lisp file. It cannot check all of the conventions, and not all the warnings it gives necessarily correspond to problems, but it is worth examining them all. Alternatively, use the command M-x checkdoc-current-buffer RET to check the conventions in the current buffer, or checkdoc-file when you want to check a file in batch mode, e.g., with a command run by M-x compile RET.


D.1 Emacs Lisp Coding Conventions

Here are conventions that you should follow when writing Emacs Lisp code intended for widespread use:


D.2 Key Binding Conventions


D.3 Emacs Programming Tips

Following these conventions will make your program fit better into Emacs when it runs.


D.4 Tips for Making Compiled Code Fast

Here are ways of improving the execution speed of byte-compiled Lisp programs.


D.5 Tips for Avoiding Compiler Warnings


D.6 Tips for Documentation Strings

Here are some tips and conventions for the writing of documentation strings. You can check many of these conventions by running the command M-x checkdoc-minor-mode.


D.7 Tips for Documentation Groups

Documentation groups, available since Emacs 28, are useful to document functions of Lisp packages based on various groupings (see Documentation Groups). This section gives some tips on how you can define documentation groups in your Lisp package in a way such that users of different Emacs versions can equally well use these groups.


D.8 Tips on Writing Comments

We recommend these conventions for comments:

‘;’

Comments that start with a single semicolon, ‘;’, should all be aligned to the same column on the right of the source code. Such comments usually explain how the code on that line does its job. For example:

(setq base-version-list                 ; There was a base
      (assoc (substring fn 0 start-vn)  ; version to which
             file-version-assoc-list))  ; this looks like
                                        ; a subversion.
‘;;’

Comments that start with two semicolons, ‘;;’, should be aligned to the same level of indentation as the code. Such comments usually describe the purpose of the following lines or the state of the program at that point. For example:

(prog1 (setq auto-fill-function
             ...
             ...
  ;; Update mode line.
  (force-mode-line-update)))

We also normally use two semicolons for comments outside functions.

;; This Lisp code is run in Emacs when it is to operate as
;; a server for other processes.

If a function has no documentation string, it should instead have a two-semicolon comment right before the function, explaining what the function does and how to call it properly. Explain precisely what each argument means and how the function interprets its possible values. It is much better to convert such comments to documentation strings, though.

‘;;;’

Comments that start with three (or more) semicolons, ‘;;;’, should start at the left margin. We use them for comments that should be considered a heading by Outline minor mode. By default, comments starting with at least three semicolons (followed by a single space and a non-whitespace character) are considered section headings, comments starting with two or fewer are not.

(Historically, triple-semicolon comments have also been used for commenting out lines within a function, but this use is discouraged in favor of using just two semicolons. This also applies when commenting out entire functions; when doing that use two semicolons as well.)

Three semicolons are used for top-level sections, four for sub-sections, five for sub-sub-sections and so on.

Typically libraries have at least four top-level sections. For example when the bodies of all of these sections are hidden:

;;; backquote.el --- implement the ` Lisp construct...
;;; Commentary:...
;;; Code:...
;;; backquote.el ends here

(In a sense the last line is not a section heading as it must never be followed by any text; after all it marks the end of the file.)

For longer libraries it is advisable to split the code into multiple sections. This can be done by splitting the ‘Code:’ section into multiple sub-sections. Even though that was the only recommended approach for a long time, many people have chosen to use multiple top-level code sections instead. You may chose either style.

Using multiple top-level code sections has the advantage that it avoids introducing an additional nesting level but it also means that the section named ‘Code’ does not contain all the code, which is awkward. To avoid that, you should put no code at all inside that section; that way it can be considered a separator instead of a section heading.

Finally, we recommend that you don’t end headings with a colon or any other punctuation for that matter. For historic reasons the ‘Code:’ and ‘Commentary:’ headings end with a colon, but we recommend that you don’t do the same for other headings anyway.

Generally speaking, the M-; (comment-dwim) command automatically starts a comment of the appropriate type; or indents an existing comment to the right place, depending on the number of semicolons. See Manipulating Comments in The GNU Emacs Manual.


D.9 Conventional Headers for Emacs Libraries

Emacs has conventions for using special comments in Lisp libraries to divide them into sections and give information such as who wrote them. Using a standard format for these items makes it easier for tools (and people) to extract the relevant information. This section explains these conventions, starting with an example:

;;; foo.el --- Support for the Foo programming language  -*- lexical-binding: t; -*-

;; Copyright (C) 2010-2026 Your Name

;; Author: Your Name <yourname@example.com>
;; Maintainer: Someone Else <someone@example.com>
;; Created: 14 Jul 2010
;; Keywords: languages
;; URL: https://example.com/foo

;; This file is not part of GNU Emacs.

;; This file is free software...
...
;; along with this file.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

The very first line should have this format:

;;; filename --- description  -*- lexical-binding: t; -*-

The description should be contained in one line. If the file needs to set more variables in the ‘-*-’ specification, add it after lexical-binding. If this would make the first line too long, use a Local Variables section at the end of the file.

The copyright notice usually lists your name (if you wrote the file). If you have an employer who claims copyright on your work, you might need to list them instead. Do not say that the copyright holder is the Free Software Foundation (or that the file is part of GNU Emacs) unless your file has been accepted into the Emacs distribution or GNU ELPA. For more information on the form of copyright and license notices, see the guide on the GNU website.

After the copyright notice come several header comment lines, each beginning with ‘;; header-name:’. Here is a table of the conventional possibilities for header-name:

‘Author’

This header states the name and email address of at least the principal author of the library. If there are multiple authors, list them on continuation lines led by ;; and a tab or at least two spaces. We recommend including a contact email address, of the form ‘<…>’. For example:

;; Author: Your Name <yourname@example.com>
;;      Someone Else <someone@example.com>
;;      Another Person <another@example.com>
‘Maintainer’

This header has the same format as the Author header. It lists the person(s) who currently maintain(s) the file (respond to bug reports, etc.).

If there is no Maintainer header, the person(s) in the Author header is/are presumed to be the maintainer(s). Some files in Emacs use ‘emacs-devel@gnu.org’ for the maintainer, which means the author is no longer responsible for the file, and that it is maintained as part of Emacs.

‘Created’

This optional line gives the original creation date of the file, and is for historical interest only.

‘Version’

If you wish to record version numbers for the individual Lisp program, put them in this line. Lisp files distributed with Emacs generally do not have a ‘Version’ header, since the version number of Emacs itself serves the same purpose. If you are distributing a collection of multiple files, we recommend not writing the version in every file, but only the main one.

‘Keywords’

This line lists keywords for the finder-by-keyword help command. Please use that command to see a list of the meaningful keywords. The command M-x checkdoc-package-keywords RET will find and display any keywords that are not in finder-known-keywords. If you set the variable checkdoc-package-keywords-flag non-nil, checkdoc commands will include the keyword verification in its checks.

This field is how people will find your package when they’re looking for things by topic. To separate the keywords, you can use spaces, commas, or both.

The name of this field is unfortunate, since people often assume it is the place to write arbitrary keywords that describe their package, rather than just the relevant Finder keywords.

‘URL’

This line states the website of the library. ‘Homepage’ is a deprecated alternative to ‘URL’.

‘Package-Version’

If ‘Version’ is not suitable for use by the package manager, then a package can define ‘Package-Version’; it will be used instead. This is handy if ‘Version’ is an RCS id or something else that cannot be parsed by version-to-list. See Packaging Basics.

‘Package-Requires’

If this exists, it names packages on which the current package depends for proper operation. See Packaging Basics. This is used by the package manager both at download time (to ensure that a complete set of packages is downloaded) and at activation time (to ensure that a package is only activated if all its dependencies have been).

Its format is a list of lists on a single line. The car of each sub-list is the name of a package, as a symbol. The cadr of each sub-list is the minimum acceptable version number, as a string that can be parsed by version-to-list. An entry that lacks a version (i.e., an entry which is just a symbol, or a sub-list of one element) is equivalent to entry with version "0". For instance:

;; Package-Requires: ((gnus "1.0") (bubbles "2.7.2") cl-lib (seq))

Packages that don’t need to support Emacs versions older than Emacs 27 can have the ‘Package-Requires’ header split across multiple lines, like this:

;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "27.1")
;;                    (compat "29.1.4.1"))

Note that with this format, you still need to start the list on the same line as ‘Package-Requires’.

The package code automatically defines a package named ‘emacs’ with the version number of the currently running Emacs. This can be used to require a minimal version of Emacs for a package.

Just about every Lisp library ought to have the ‘Author’ and ‘Keywords’ header comment lines. Use the others if they are appropriate. You can also put in header lines with other header names—they have no standard meanings, so they can’t do any harm.

We use additional stylized comments to subdivide the contents of the library file. These should be separated from anything else by blank lines. Here is a table of them:

‘;;; Commentary:’

This begins introductory comments that explain how the library works. It should come right after the copying permissions, and is terminated by one of the comment lines described below: ‘Change Log’, ‘History’ or ‘Code’. This text is used by the Finder package, so it should make sense in that context.

‘;;; Change Log:’

This begins an optional log of changes to the file over time. Don’t put too much information in this section—it is better to keep the detailed logs in a version control system (as Emacs does) or in a separate ChangeLog file. ‘History’ is an alternative to ‘Change Log’.

‘;;; Code:’

This begins the actual code of the program.

‘;;; filename ends here’

This is the footer line; it appears at the very end of the file. Its purpose is to enable people to detect truncated versions of the file from the lack of a footer line.


Footnotes

(37)

The benefits of a Common Lisp-style package system are considered not to outweigh the costs.

(38)

We do use these occasionally, but try not to overdo it.